The Quetta Massacre and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor
By Alvin Cheng-Hin Lim

The Quetta Massacre and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor

Aug. 22, 2016  |     |  0 comments

On August 8, 2016, over 70 people were killed and more than 120 injured in a suicide bombing in Quetta, the capital of Pakistan’s Balochistan province. As Balochistan is the location of Gwadar Port, the southern terminus of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the Quetta massacre highlights the security risks facing CPEC. The Quetta attack followed a two-step tactic. First, the terrorist group assassinated Bilal Kasi, the president of the Balochistan Bar Association. Later that same day, they sent a suicide bomber to infiltrate the large crowd of lawyers and journalists who had gathered at the hospital where Kasi’s body had been taken and to detonate himself. Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, a splinter group of the Pakistani Taliban, claimed responsibility for the attack, as did the Islamic State (IS), though analysts suspect IS’ claim might be due to Jamaat-ul-Ahrar’s past expressions of support for it. As security experts have noted, the two-step tactic has long been used by the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan, including an earlier attack in Quetta in 2013 when a Pakistani Taliban suicide bomber killed 30 mourners at the funeral of a policeman who had similarly been assassinated (Masood, 2016; The Soufan Group, 2016).

Security experts note that, following a series of militant attacks between 2007-09 against military and other “hard” targets in Pakistan, jihadist groups have resumed their attacks on “soft” targets: not just minority ethnic groups like the Hazara or minority religious groups like the Ahmedis, Barelvis, Christians, and Shiites; but also relatively unprotected civilian locations like airports, schools, hospitals, polio vaccination centers, and parks; as well as key civilian groups like lawyers and policemen (Fair, 2016; Husser, 2016; Masood, 2016; Rifaat, 2016; Shahid, 2016; Cornish & Peshimam, 2016). Highlighting the Pakistani state’s anxiety over the security threats to CPEC, the Pakistani Chief of Army Staff General Raheel Sharif warned that the deadly Quetta attack was “an attempt to undermine improved security” in Balochistan, and that the terrorists had been “specially targeting CPEC” (Sharif, 2016). The Pakistani military has promptly launched “special combing operations” against suspected militant targets, and Pakistani intelligence has been authorized “to go anywhere in the country and to target anyone who was responsible for the horrific attack” (Shahzad, 2016).

For IS, which has been actively recruiting former Taliban militants in Pakistan, Balochistan presents a tempting target (Hussain, 2016). According to Arif Rafiq, a security expert with the Centre for Global Policy:

“Balochistan provides IS with an opportunity to not only strike at Pakistani interests, but also those of China and Iran … Anti-state jihadis in Pakistan have previously sought to target Chinese citizens in Pakistan, knowing that this would strain relations between Beijing and Islamabad. Jihadis in Balochistan who’ve made the switch from al-Qaeda to IS are on a similar mission.” (Hussain, 2016)

Of particular concern for the security of Gwadar Port is IS’ recruitment of ethnic Baloch jihadis who had formerly served with al-Qaeda-affiliated groups in Pakistan, as they offer IS “access to the safe houses and human smuggling networks operated by separatists and Karachi-based criminal gangs” (Hussain, 2016). However, the primary threat to Gwadar Port and CPEC’s Western Route highway network in Balochistan remains the separatist Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), which has described CPEC as “an occupation of Baluch territory” and which has threatened to “attack anyone working on the project” (Hassan, 2016). Earlier this year, Pakistani intelligence intercepted a plot by Afghanistan and India to “encourage and assist Baloch violence against the CPEC,” and an alleged Indian intelligence agent was subsequently arrested in Balochistan (Lim, 2016).

Baloch separatist violence against the Chinese development of Gwadar Port dates back over a decade, when three Chinese engineers were murdered by Baloch separatists in 2004. (China’s Gwadar Port project was inaugurated by then-Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji in 2001.) The separatist violence has persisted after the incorporation of the Gwadar Port project into the larger CPEC megaproject. In April 2015 the BLF killed twenty Pakistani construction workers, and later that month, on the day Chinese President Xi Jinping addressed the Pakistani parliament, the BLF attacked a radar station at Gwadar, pointedly warning both the Chinese and Pakistani governments of their continued presence (Garver, 2006, pp. 7-10; Masood & Walsh, 2015; “Baloch ire prompts,” 2015).

Further north, past Balochistan, the highways of CPEC’s Western Route cross into the contested territories claimed by the jihadist militias located in Peshawar and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) along the Afghan-Pakistani border (Hassan, 2016). Chinese projects in Pakistan have long been menaced by these groups. Over a decade earlier, in 2004, two Chinese engineers working on a hydroelectric dam in South Waziristan were kidnapped by the Taliban, and one of them was killed in the ensuing rescue operation (Masood & Walsh, 2015). Three years after this incident, Chinese workers from a massage parlor in Islamabad were kidnapped by radical Islamists from the Lal Masjid (Red Mosque), and furious pressure from the Chinese government forced the Pakistani government to launch a deadly raid on the mosque. The 2007 crackdown on the Lal Masjid had a devastating unforeseen consequence: the jihadist militias in FATA decided to form the Pakistani Taliban, transforming their limited rebellion into a “full-blown insurgency” (Small, 2015, pp. ix-xv; Tankel, 2016, p. 12).

Another jihadist militia of concern to CPEC is the Eastern Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), a Uighur militant group which is primarily based in China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, but which has cells located across Western and Central Asia, including a cell in Pakistan’s North Waziristan region with up to 500 jihadists (Lim, 2015c). ETIM has been responsible for a series of terrorist attacks across China, and there are concerns that their members in Pakistan may target CPEC projects. These concerns have increased with reports in 2014 of ETIM jihadists joining IS. The prospect of IS-trained ETIM jihadists poses a threat not just to China but also to China’s global projects, especially CPEC (Gohel, 2014; Qiu, 2014; Allen-Ebrahimian, 2016). Underscoring the seriousness of the threat posed by ETIM and other jihadist groups, President Xi announced during his 2015 state visit to Pakistan that China will be assisting the Pakistani military with its operations against jihadist militias on the Afghan-Pakistani border (Haider, 2015).

To protect the CPEC construction sites and their Chinese engineers and workers, the Pakistani government is establishing a special security force consisting of 15,000 security personnel.

One of the counterinsurgent strategies pursued by the Pakistani government against the jihadist threat has been the organization and arming of civilian militias in FATA and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. However, this strategy has serious implications for security, as not only is there the possibility of foreign influence over these civilian militias, there is also the possibility that such militarization of tribal groups could lead to lawlessness, including tribal warfare. Following the establishment of these civilian militias, armed conflict between rival tribes has indeed been reported (Ullah, 2016, pp. 165-169).

To protect the CPEC construction sites and their Chinese engineers and workers, the Pakistani government is establishing a special security force consisting of 15,000 security personnel, 9,000 of whom will consist of military personnel and the remaining 6,000 civilian personnel. One percent of China’s USD 46 billion investment in CPEC will be used to pay for this security force, and the Chinese government will also supply 500 security experts to train the Pakistani security personnel. At the local level, the provincial government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa will establish its own security force of 9,000 personnel to protect its CPEC construction projects. The other provincial governments may follow suit (Chaudhry, 2016; “KP to establish,” 2016).

These security arrangements highlight the importance to which China and Pakistan both view CPEC. For Pakistan, CPEC represents a major opportunity to upgrade its transportation, communications, industrial, and energy infrastructure at low- or no-interest concessional financing rates (Lim, 2015c; Markey & West, 2016). Not only is Pakistan’s economy expected to receive a major boost to its growth from the increased trade and logistics activity along the new CPEC highways and railways, as well as the increased manufacturing and associated economic activities in the new CPEC industrial parks and special economic zones; this economic development — in particular the expected increase in employment and business opportunities in Pakistan’s economically underdeveloped regions — is in turn expected to facilitate the establishment of long-term peace and security in the troubled country (Yousafzai, 2016; “CPEC to Benefit,” 2016).

For China, CPEC, like the other international infrastructure projects under the Chinese government’s “One Belt One Road” (OBOR) global investment framework, will function as one of the engines of growth underlying the Chinese economy’s “new normal” of single-digit growth. CPEC, like the other OBOR projects, will also assist with the Chinese government’s supply-side reform plans by creating space in Pakistan’s industrial sector for Chinese enterprises to migrate their industrial plant, thereby helping China reduce its domestic industrial overcapacity. This in turn will facilitate the Chinese government’s strategy of transitioning China from a manufacturing-based to a consumption-based economy (Lim, 2015b; “China to resolutely,” 2016). More urgently, the successful completion of CPEC will be a crucial demonstration to the world that OBOR remains a viable project for future investment. Such a demonstration is needed given the unexpected recent challenges to OBOR in Southeast Asia. In Laos, the commencement of construction of the Kunming-Vientiane high-speed railway has been delayed over demands from the Laotian government for improved financing terms from China (Goh & Webb, 2016). In Indonesia, the Indonesian government has recently chosen to grant port and rail development projects to Japan, despite having earlier considered China’s OBOR proposals for these projects (Lim, 2015a, p. 37; Budiman, 2016; Vatvani, 2016). With so much at stake, it is critical for China and Pakistan to ensure that the security arrangements for CPEC are sufficient to protect its projects from the threats posed by Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, the BLF, ETIM, and other groups.


Allen-Ebrahimian, B. (2016, July 20). Report: More than 100 Chinese Muslims have joined the Islamic State. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from

Baloch ire prompts security fears for China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. (2015, April 21). AFP. Retrieved from

Budiman, A. (2016, May 27). Indonesia, Japan to go with Jakarta-Surabaya 5-hour train project. Tempo. Retrieved from

Chaudhry, M. A. (2016, July 16). 15,000 security personnel to be recruited to protect CPEC. Daily Times. Retrieved from

China to resolutely implement supply-side reform. (2016, July 27). Xinhua. Retrieved from

Cornish, A. and Peshimam, G. (2016, August 8). At least 70 dead in suicide bombing at Pakistan hospital. NPR. Retrieved from

CPEC to benefit 3b people thru enhanced connectivity. (2016, April 25). Pakistan Observer. Retrieved from

Fair, C. C. (2016, August 11). The Quetta hospital attack and terrorism trends in Pakistan. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from

Garver, J. W. (2006). Development of China’s overland transportation Links with central, south-west and south Asia. The China Quarterly, 185, 1-22.

Goh, B. and Webb, S. (2016, June 4). On southwestern fringe, China’s Silk Road ambitions face obstacles. Reuters. Retrieved from

Gohel, S. M. (2014, December 10). The “seventh stage” of terrorism in China. CTC Sentinel. Retrieved from

Haider, K. (2015, April 20). China’s Xi pours money into Pakistan, his ‘all-weather’ friend. Bloomberg. Retrieved from

Hassan, S. R. (2016, February 7). To protect Chinese investment, Pakistan military leaves little to chance. Reuters. Retrieved from

Hussain, T. (2016, August 13). Karachi to Kashgar: how Islamic State poses a threat to China. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from

Husser, A. (2016, March 29). Jamaat-ul-Ahrar: Group behind Lahore blast part of ‘saturated’ jihadist market. CBC News. Retrieved from

KP to establish special force for CPEC security. (2016, July 15). Daily Times. Retrieved from

Lim, A. C. H. (2015a). China’s ‘Belt and Road’ and Southeast Asia: Challenges and prospects. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Southeast Asia (pp. 33-42). Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.

Lim, A. C. H. (2015b, April 2). China’s transition to the ‘new normal’: Challenges and opportunities. Eurasia Review. Retrieved from

Lim, A. C. H. (2015c, May 7). ‘Iron brothers’: Sino-Pakistani relations and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Eurasia Review. Retrieved from

Lim, A. C. H. (2016, May 16). The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor one year on. Eurasia Review. Retrieved from

Markey, D. S. and West, J. (2016, May 12). Behind China’s gambit in Pakistan. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from

Masood, S. (2016, August 8). Suicide bomber kills dozens at Pakistani hospital in Quetta. New York Times. Retrieved from

Masood, S. and Walsh, D. (2015, April 21). Xi Jinping plans to fund Pakistan. New York Times. Retrieved from

Qiu, Y. Z. (2014, December 15). Turkey’s ambiguous policies help terrorists join IS jihadist group: analyst. Global Times. Retrieved from

Rifaat, H. (2016, August 12). Pakistan’s need for a multipronged counterterror approach. The Diplomat. Retrieved


Shahzad, K. (2016, August 8). Quetta attack: COAS Raheel Sharif orders special combing operations across the country. Daily Pakistan. Retrieved from

Shahid, K. K. (2016, August 9). What Quetta bombing reveals about Islamic State and Pakistani Taliban. The Diplomat. Retrieved from

Sharif, R. [RaheelSharif_]. (2016, August 8). Is an attempt to undermine improved security in Bln,specially targeting CPEC.All resources to be employed to control situation.-5 [Tweet]. Retrieved from

Small, A. (2015). The China-Pakistan Axis: Asia’s New Geopolitics. London: Hurst & Company.

Tankel, S. (2016, June 16) Beyond the double game: Lessons from Pakistan’s approach to Islamist militancy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 1-31.

The Soufan Group. (2016, August 9). TSG IntelBrief: Terror Attacks on Mourners. Retrieved from

Ullah, R. (2016). Militias as a Counterinsurgency Strategy in Pakistan (2002-2013) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Peshawar, Pakistan.

Vatvani, C. (2016, May 26). Japan, Indonesia could work on port, rail projects: Official. Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved from

Yousafzai, F. (2016, May 11). Pakistan asks China to include 4 industrial zones in CPEC. The Nation. Retrieved from

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *